Alexander v. Sparks Regional Medical Center
Plaintiff: Mildred P. Alexander
Defendant: Sparks Regional Medical Center
Case Number: 2:2011cv02247
Filed: December 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Sebastian
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that plaintiff's complaint and all amendments thereto be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 3, 2012. (rw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Sparks Regional Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mildred P. Alexander
Represented By: Jeff Mixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sparks Regional Medical Center
Represented By: J. Michael Cogbill
Represented By: Rebecca Dawn Hattabaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?