Lira-Perez v. Arkansas, State of et al
| Uriel Lira-Perez |
| Arkansas, State of, Sebastian, County of and John Doe Defendants |
| 2:2012cv02239 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Sebastian |
| Robert T. Dawson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 12 MOTION to Dismiss Case. Further, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on January 16, 2014. (lw)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 5 and dismissing defendant Arkansas, State. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on May 15, 2013. (sh)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 4 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Motion for Service, and DIRECTING SERVICE of summons and USM285 for each defendant being served. The clerk is directed to substitute Sheriff Hollenbeck as a defendant in place of the Sheriff's Department. ORDER DIRECTING THE MARSHALS SERVICE TO SERVE Sheriff Hollenbeck and granting 21 days to answer, and directing Clerk to assess filing fee and collect funds from Prison Account of Uriel Lira-Perez. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 24, 2013. (cc: U.S. Marshals Service)(sh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
