Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| David Alan Wilson |
| Don Nelson, Corizon, James Pratt, John Harold and Jim McLean |
| 6:2013cv06036 |
| April 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Hot Springs Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Barry A. Bryant |
| Susan O. Hickey |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER ADOPTING 93 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting defendants' 61 Motion for Summary Judgment and 68 Motion for Summary Judgment; further plaintiffs' claims against all defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on March 31, 2015. (rw)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Jury Trial; denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 32 Motion to Appoint Expert; granting 39 Motion for Leave, that the answer filed 11/12/13, will be considered timely filed; granting 42 Motion to Ta ke Deposition from David Alan Wilson; granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying as moot 45 Motion to Postpone Deposition. Further, directing the Defendants to file a motion for Summary Judgment.( Summary Judgment Motion due by 5/27/2014). Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on February 24, 2014. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
