United States of America v. $2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125,435.62 in Bank Funds

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District United States of America v. $2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125,435.62 in Bank Funds

United States of America v. $2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125,435.62 in Bank Funds

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	$2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125, 435.62 in Bank Funds
Claimant:	Jill Johnson Bennett, Lamont Bennett and Light Up Life Entertainment, Inc
Case Number:	2:2008cv03306
Filed:	November 22, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge:	Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge:	George H. King
Nature of Suit:	Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action:	18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 22, 2013	Filing 86 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge George H. King: $1,380,862.00 and $824,485.00, respectively, of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency, plus the interest earned by the United States of America on $1,380,862.00 and� 36;824,485.00, respectively, of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency, shall be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds in accordance with law. The remainder of the defendants (i.e., � 36;14,238.85, $5,474.35 and $300,000.00 of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency; defendant $29,500.00 in Euros; defendant $2,500.00 in Travelers Checks; and defendant $125,435.62 in Bank Funds), plus all intere st earned by the United States of America on $14,238.85, $5,474.35 and $300,000.00 of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency; defendant $29,500.00 in Euros; defendant $2,500.00 in Travelers Checks; and defendant $125,435.62 in Bank Funds (collectively, the "Non-Forfeited Funds") shall be returned to claimants Lamont Bennett and Jill Johnson Bennett. (See document for further details) (ir)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 22, 2013

Filing 86 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge George H. King: $1,380,862.00 and $824,485.00, respectively, of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency, plus the interest earned by the United States of America on $1,380,862.00 and� 36;824,485.00, respectively, of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency, shall be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds in accordance with law. The remainder of the defendants (i.e., � 36;14,238.85, $5,474.35 and $300,000.00 of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency; defendant $29,500.00 in Euros; defendant $2,500.00 in Travelers Checks; and defendant $125,435.62 in Bank Funds), plus all intere st earned by the United States of America on $14,238.85, $5,474.35 and $300,000.00 of the defendant $2,525,059.70 in U.S. Currency; defendant $29,500.00 in Euros; defendant $2,500.00 in Travelers Checks; and defendant $125,435.62 in Bank Funds (collectively, the "Non-Forfeited Funds") shall be returned to claimants Lamont Bennett and Jill Johnson Bennett. (See document for further details) (ir)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125,435.62 in Bank Funds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Claimant: Jill Johnson Bennett
Represented By:	Roger J Rosen
Represented By:	Paul L Gabbert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Claimant: Lamont Bennett
Represented By:	Roger J Rosen
Represented By:	Paul L Gabbert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Claimant: Light Up Life Entertainment, Inc
Represented By:	Roger J Rosen
Represented By:	Paul L Gabbert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: $2,525,059.70 In U.S. Currency, $29,500.00 In Euros, $2,500.00 In Travelers Checks and $125, 435.62 in Bank Funds
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Victor A Rodgers, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?