Daniel Sabaj et al v. Nobeltel LLC et al
| Pedro Jax, Espranza Quinonez and Daniel Sabaj |
| Nobeltel LLC, Nobel, Inc. and Does |
| 2:2009cv06245 |
| August 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Woehrle |
| Wright |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Otis D Wright, II: Order for Supplemental Briefing re Subject Matter Jurisdiction from both parties. Briefs are to be seven (7) pages or less, in addition to any supporting affidavits and evidence that m ay exist. They must be filed and served no later than the close of business on January 29, 2010. The Court is particularly interested in evidence that may shed light upon the percentage of class members who reside in California. Defendants pending Motion to Dismiss 6 remains continued until further notice. (lc)
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER to Show Cause Re Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction held before Judge Otis D Wright, II. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later than 12/23/2009, why ths action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss 6 currently set for hearing on 12/21/2009 is hereby CONTINUED until further notice. (csi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
