Amy Schneirow Fannon v. Nexicon Inc et al
| Amy Schneirow Fannon |
| Nexicon Inc, Sam Glines, Richard Urrea, Tommy Stiansen and Does |
| 2:2009cv07773 |
| October 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Morrow |
| Mumm |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
Stipulation and Order for Dismiising of Entire Action With Prejudice and to Retain Jurisdiction by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mr)
|
|
Filing
88
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: To date, the parties have not filed a proposed pretrial conference order and other documents identified in the Court's Schedulin g and Case Management Order dated 7/26/2010 58 . The Court hereby continues the Final Pretrial Conference, along with the hearing on the motions in limine 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 to 1/20/2011 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. The parties shall file the required final pretrial conference documents by 1/11/2011. The parties also shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause by 1/11/2011, explaining why the parties and/or their counsel should not be sanctioned for their failure to timely comply with the Court's Scheduling and Case Management Order. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY MATTER SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Defendants are ordered to show cause in writing why the matter should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants shall file a brief with the Court by no later than 3/24/2010 and Plaintiff may file a response by 3/31/2010. The 3/12/2010 hearings on the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed by counsel for Defendants 7 and on Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or Summary Judgment 9 shall be continued to 4/12/2010 at 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
