Martin Vogel v. RHA Partners Ltd

Martin Vogel v. RHA Partners Ltd

Plaintiff:	Martin Vogel
Defendant:	RHA Partners Ltd
Case Number:	2:2013cv01941
Filed:	March 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge:	Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2013	Filing 13 ORDER re Notice of Settlement 12 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is removed from this Courts active caseload without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to request a status conference be scheduled if settlement is not consummated. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)
July 23, 2013	Filing 5 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than August 6, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2013

Filing 13 ORDER re Notice of Settlement 12 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is removed from this Courts active caseload without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to request a status conference be scheduled if settlement is not consummated. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)

July 23, 2013

Filing 5 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than August 6, 2013 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin Vogel v. RHA Partners Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Represented By:	Khushpreet R Mehton
Represented By:	Disabled Advocacy Group APLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RHA Partners Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?