United States of America v. Ernest L Gibson

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ernest L Gibson
Case Number: 2:2013cv02874
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: CVRecovery Case CRStatistics Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 15, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu in favor of United States of America against Ernest L Gibson in the principal amount of $2,015.28, interest in the plus interest accrued to April 17, 2013, in the sum of $2,598.66; with interest accruing thereafter at 8% annually until entry of judgment, and administrative costs in the amount of $40.0 for a total judgment of $4,653.94. 15 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (pj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Ernest L Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Jacquelyne M Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ernest L Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.