Mark Shannon Weaver v. Linda Sanders
Petitioner: Mark Shannon Weaver
Respondent: Warden Linda Sanders
Case Number: 2:2013cv03269
Filed: May 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin, Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order Summarily Dismissing Action Without Prejudice, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mark Shannon Weaver v. Linda Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Shannon Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Linda Sanders
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?