Anna Ortega v. The Kroger Co.

Defendant: The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff: Anna Ortega
Case Number: 2:2014cv01949
Filed: March 14, 2014
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 14, 2014 62 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case With Prejudice 61 . Each party to bear its own costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anna Ortega v. The Kroger Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Kroger Co.
Represented By: Edward P Boyle
Represented By: Roger A Colaizzi
Represented By: Jennifer Levin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Ortega
Represented By: Jonas Palmer Mann
Represented By: Cheryl Leahy
Represented By: Jeffrey D Kaliel
Represented By: Dana Marie Isaac
Represented By: Michael McShane
Represented By: Lisa Monica Winebarger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.