J. N. v. Heather M. Hendrickson et al
J. N. |
Rick Braziel, City of Sacramento, Detective Heather M. Hendrickson, Detective J. Lerose, Roes, Sacramento Police Department and Ten Unknown Named Defendants |
2:2014cv02428 |
March 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 189 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING 149 Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney Fees in the amount of $471,820.45. See order for details. (shb) |
Filing 167 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEATHER M HENDRICKSON'S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR 149 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The award of damages is remitted from $5,000,000 to $3,000,000. Plaintiff shall have ten days from the date of this Order to acce pt or reject the remittitur. Should Plaintiff accept, a final judgment shall issue. Should Plaintiff reject the remittitur, the Court shall grant Defendants' Motion for a New Trial in the Alternative on the issue of damages only. (lc). Modified on 6/12/201.7 (lc). |
Filing 143 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: That judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, J. N., and against the defendant, Heather Hendrickson, for violations of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to recover the sum of $5,000,000, with interest thereon at the rate provided by law; That judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, J. N., and against the defendant, Heather Hendrickson, to recover punitive damages, in the sum of $5,000, with interest thereon at the rate provided by law. Any attorney fees or costs to be awarded to any party will be addressed in a separate order by the Court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) |
Filing 120 ORDER RE: DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTION (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, (lc) |
Filing 51 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ANNE MARIE SCHUBERTS MOTION TO DISMISS 40 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Because the Court finds that Defendant Schubert is protected by absolute prosecutorial immunity for the actions the Third Amended Complaint alleges Sc hubert did that resulted in Plaintiffs harm, the Court does not resolve the time bar issue. For the reasons stated above, Defendant Schubert's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) Terminating Anne Marie Schubert. (vv) Modified on 9/22/2015 (vv). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.