J. N. v. Heather M. Hendrickson et al
Plaintiff: J. N.
Defendant: Rick Braziel, City of Sacramento, Detective Heather M. Hendrickson, Detective J. Lerose, Roes, Sacramento Police Department and Ten Unknown Named Defendants
Case Number: 2:2014cv02428
Filed: March 31, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING 149 Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney Fees in the amount of $471,820.45. See order for details. (shb)
June 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HEATHER M HENDRICKSON'S MOTION FOR REMITTITUR 149 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The award of damages is remitted from $5,000,000 to $3,000,000. Plaintiff shall have ten days from the date of this Order to acce pt or reject the remittitur. Should Plaintiff accept, a final judgment shall issue. Should Plaintiff reject the remittitur, the Court shall grant Defendants' Motion for a New Trial in the Alternative on the issue of damages only. (lc). Modified on 6/12/201.7 (lc).
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 143 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: That judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, J. N., and against the defendant, Heather Hendrickson, for violations of rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to recover the sum of $5,000,000, with interest thereon at the rate provided by law; That judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, J. N., and against the defendant, Heather Hendrickson, to recover punitive damages, in the sum of $5,000, with interest thereon at the rate provided by law. Any attorney fees or costs to be awarded to any party will be addressed in a separate order by the Court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER RE: DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTION (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson, (lc)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ANNE MARIE SCHUBERTS MOTION TO DISMISS 40 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Because the Court finds that Defendant Schubert is protected by absolute prosecutorial immunity for the actions the Third Amended Complaint alleges Sc hubert did that resulted in Plaintiffs harm, the Court does not resolve the time bar issue. For the reasons stated above, Defendant Schubert's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) Terminating Anne Marie Schubert. (vv) Modified on 9/22/2015 (vv).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: J. N. v. Heather M. Hendrickson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Braziel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Heather M. Hendrickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective J. Lerose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ten Unknown Named Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. N.
Represented By: Jeff Dominic Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?