Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Pamela Tinky Mnyandu |
| Maricio Arocha, Anthony Colannino, County of Los Angeles, Aida Croosthwaite, Does, Ana Gray, Charlie Hill, Los Angeles Unified School District, Leslie Lunsway, John McLaughlin, Office of the District Attorney, Vittorio Racowaski, Jeffrey Rose, Joan Schneider and The School Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District |
| 2:2014cv06485 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| P.I.: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
307
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge, It is Adjudged that plaintiff take nothing by her Second Amended Complaint and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 281 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to all Plaintiff's clai ms against Defendants' Sedgwick, Lunsway & Rose 258 . IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment as to all plaintiff's claims against defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Leslie Lunsway, and Jeffrey Rose (the "Sedgwick Defendants") is granted; and (2) all of plaintiff's claims against the Sedgwick Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. (hr)
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (see attached) Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/19/2017. (jm)
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer: (see attached) (jm)
|
|
Filing
175
MEMORANDUM (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: DENYING 156 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (shb)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer: IT IS ORDERED that the motions to dismiss of defendants Schneider and Arocha are GRANTED and that plaintiff's claim for malicious prosecution as to defendants Schnieder and Arocha is dismissed without leave to amend. The Court having resolved all pending motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies the Court previously found with respect to the following claims and following parties: (see attached) (jm)
|
|
Filing
134
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN MCLAUGHLIN'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: Plaintiff does not state that a copy of the summons and complaint was left with anyone over the age of 18 years at defendant's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address. Therefore, substituted service was not properly effected. Accordingly, the motion to quash service of process is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss the complaint is DENIED as moot. *See Order for details.* (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
