Thomas E Perez v. G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan et al
| Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez |
| G&H Technology, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, Procyon Technologies, Inc., Lee Schuh, Carl Weiss and XAF, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv00391 |
| January 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that: 1. Schuh has no objection to the Courts granting of the Motion forDefault Judgment filed by the Secretary of Labor against Defendant XAF; to the removal of XAF from its position as fiduciary of the Plan; and to the appointment of Thomas A. Dillon, Esq. The Secretary and Defendant Schuh shall each bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees incurred to date in connection with any stage of this proceeding, including but not limited to attorneys fees which may be available under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended. Defendant Schuh expressly waives any and all claims of any nature which he has or may have against the Secretary, the D epartment of Labor, or any of its officers, agents, attorneys, employees or repesentatives, arising out of or in connection with the allegations contained in the Complaint on file in this action, any other proceedings or investigation incident thereto or based on the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended. This Court retains jurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Judgment & Order. (See order for further details). (shb)
|
|
Filing
30
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER ENTERED INTO BY THE SECRETARY OF LABOR and CARL WEISS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS REQUIREMENTS THEREIN ) ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
