Billy James Curry v. Sandra Alfaro
Petitioner: Billy James Curry
Respondent: Sandra Alfaro
Case Number: 2:2015cv01309
Filed: February 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reason set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order 26 Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus With Prejudice and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Billy James Curry v. Sandra Alfaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sandra Alfaro
Represented By: Kenneth C Byrne
Represented By: E Carlos Dominguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Billy James Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?