Peter Gallagher et al v. Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. et al
| Peter Gallagher |
| Does, Andrew Goddard, Lions Gate Entertainment Inc., Lions Gate Films, Inc., Mutant Enemy, Inc. and Joseph Whedon |
| 2:2015cv02739 |
| April 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. 505 29 29 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Defendants Lions Gate Entertainment Inc., Lions Gate Films Inc shall recover cost and fees in the amount of $47,290.38, inclusive of $2,021.06 in costs. (lc) .Modified on 10/27/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the works in question in their entirety and found they are not similar, thus, making proof of access a moot point and any amendment futile. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. 18 (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (vv)
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION to Dismiss Case 18 scheduled for June 29, 2015 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
