ALAW v. United States of America et al
ALAW |
Nora Gutierrez, Roberto Gutierrez, International Wholesale Title, LLC and United States of America |
2:2015cv03059 |
April 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Taxes |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Judgment Distributing the Deposited Funds 8 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson : Los Angeles County Superior Court shall distribute the $33,526.88 in surplus funds on deposit from case number VS026864 by check made payable to International Wholesale T ile, LLC. Payment shall be send to: Martin D. Goodman 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94104. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that receipt of $33,526.88 from the Los Angeles County Superior Court shall fully satisfy all claims by Inter national Wholesale Tile, LLC against Roberto Gutierrez individually, and Roberto Gutierrez dba Color Tile Outlet, dba TheTile Outlet Discount Center. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order does not affect the tax liabilities of Nora Gutierrez or the t ax liens against Nora Gutierrez. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that United States of America, International Wholesale Tile, LLC, Roberto Gutierrez, and Nora Gutierrez, will each bear their own costs and attorneys fees.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc). Mailed certified copy of this order to Los Angeles Superior Court Norwalk, NO. VS026865 Modified on 6/12/2015 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.