Minx, Inc. v. Jamberry Nails, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Minx, Inc.
Defendant: Jamberry Nails, LLC and Jamberry Nails Australia, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv03478
Filed: May 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2015 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc.. Dismissal is without prejudice. (De La Cruz, Andre)
June 9, 2015 Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(De La Cruz, Andre)
May 12, 2015 Filing 11 STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. See Order for Details. (bp)
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads CV15-03478 JAK (JEMx). (mg)
May 8, 2015 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Jamberry Nails Australia, LLC, Jamberry Nails, LLC. (esa)
May 8, 2015 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
May 8, 2015 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa)
May 8, 2015 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Exhibit (non-trial) #2 filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc.. (De La Cruz, Andre)
May 8, 2015 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Minx, Inc.. (De La Cruz, Andre)
May 8, 2015 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc. (De La Cruz, Andre)
May 8, 2015 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc.. (De La Cruz, Andre)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc.. A as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (De La Cruz, Andre)
May 8, 2015 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-15689130 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Minx, Inc.. (Attorney Andre De La Cruz added to party Minx, Inc.(pty:pla))(De La Cruz, Andre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minx, Inc. v. Jamberry Nails, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Minx, Inc.
Represented By: Finley L Taylor
Represented By: Andre De La Cruz
Represented By: Jessica A Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamberry Nails, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamberry Nails Australia, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?