Aaron Lofist et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| Aaron Lofist and Deirdre Mehmood |
| City of Los Angeles and Does |
| 2:2015cv03538 |
| May 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Andre Birotte |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 62 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action against Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BRITTANY ELENES, YUDIT MARTINEZ, KEVAN BEARD, ABEL CEPEIDA, BRANDON ROACH, WILLIAM HINES and ERICK SANDOVAL, is dismissed, with prejudice in its entirety. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. This dismissal does not constitute an adjudication on the merits. (gk)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised that the above-entitled action has been settled 60 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Stipulation for Protective Order 55 . (ec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
