Jamar Leveal Thomas v. G S Lewis
Petitioner: Jamar Leveal Thomas
Respondent: G S Lewis
Case Number: 5:2014cv02144
Filed: October 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith 18 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jamar Leveal Thomas v. G S Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: G S Lewis
Represented By: David Delgado-Rucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamar Leveal Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?