Microsoft Corporation v. Computer Parts Depot, Inc et al
Microsoft Corporation |
Computer Parts Depot, Inc and Neil Mittie |
5:2014cv02229 |
October 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Andre Birotte |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS COMPUTER PARTS DEPOT, INC. AND NEIL MITTIE 31 filed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Computer Parts Depot, Inc., a California corporation, and Nei l Mittie, an individual, ("Defendants") along with Defendants' directors, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors and assigns, and all those persons or entities acting in concert or participation with Defendants, shall be and hereby are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED. (See attached document for details.) (lom) Modified on 3/10/2016 (lom). |
Filing 28 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised that the above-entitled action has been settled 27 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the rig ht, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.