James Hamilton v. Cliff Allenby et al
| James Hamilton |
| Pam Ahlin, Cliff Allenby, Audrey King, Stephen Mayberg and Tom Voss |
| 5:2014cv02389 |
| November 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER RE CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. 1. Plaintiff's official capacity claims for punitive damages are dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice. 2. The Complaint otherwise is dismissed with leave to amend. If Pla intiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. Failure to file timely a First Amended Complaint in conformity with this Order may result in the dis missal of this action. 3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must file a separate writing attempting to show cause, if any there be, why the action should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Failure to do so may be deemed consent to the transfer. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
