Mike Spanos v. US Bancorp et al
| Mike Spanos |
| Cal-Western Reconveyance LLC, Does, Eagle Vista Equities LLC, Servis One Inc and US Bancorp |
| 5:2015cv00162 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MINUTE (IN CHAMBER) ORDER REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: Plaintiff has failed to establish federal court subject matter jurisdiction under either section 1332 or section 1331. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this matter to the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate response to this Order will (1 ) demonstrate that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, and (2) identify the members or owners of the LLC Defendants, as well as every state in which every member or owner is a citizen. Plaintiff's response to this Order shall be filed no later than Friday, February 6, 2015, by 4:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
