Pamela Thomas-Byass v. Michael Kors Stores (California), Inc. et al
Pamela Thomas-Byass |
Does 1 through 50 and Michael Kors Stores (California), Inc. |
5:2015cv00369 |
February 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G. Bernal |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 52 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically by Victoria B. Rivapalacio. (See Order for details) the Court GRA NTS Plaintiffs Motion for further responses to Requests 38 and 39. No later than September 29, 2015, the parties shall submit a stipulated proposed protective order. The parties are further directed to the Courts sample stipulated protective order located on the Court's website for a sample of the format of an approved stipulated protective order. The parties are strongly encouraged to use the language contained in the approved stipulated protective order. No later than close of business on October 5, 2015, Defendant shall respond to Requests 38 and 39. The hearing set for September 24, 2015 (Dkt. 38), is hereby VACATED. (dts) |
Filing 34 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (ECF No. 31) The hearing set for July 30, 2015 (Dkt. 31), is hereby VACATED. (dts) Modified on 7/17/2015 (dts). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.