David Vinh Dinh v. Elvin Valenzuela
Petitioner: David Vinh Dinh
Respondent: Elvin Valenzuela
Case Number: 8:2014cv01993
Filed: December 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge 21 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and entire action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Vinh Dinh v. Elvin Valenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Vinh Dinh
Represented By: E Thomas Dunn, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elvin Valenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?