Gilbert Salinas v. Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC et al
Gilbert Salinas |
Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC, DOES 1-10 and Hat World, Inc. |
8:2015cv00393 |
March 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N Block |
David O Carter |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter Re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #15 . This action is hereby ordered dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs. (jtil) |
Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to with prejudice filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Salinas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE by Judge David O. Carter, re Notice of Settlement #13 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dgo) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Gilbert Salinas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gilbert Salinas, upon Defendant Hat World, Inc. served on 3/16/2015, answer due 5/6/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky De George-(Corp Service Company-Agent for Service of Process) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Potter, Mark) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC answer now due 5/18/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC.(Attorney David L Sanner added to party Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC(pty:dft))(Sanner, David) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hat World, Inc. answer now due 5/6/2015, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Hat World, Inc..(Attorney Teresa C Chow added to party Hat World, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chow, Teresa) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gilbert Salinas, upon Defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC served on 3/25/2015, answer due 4/15/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ms. Christina Baird - Office Manager (Authorized to accept) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons returned. (Potter, Mark) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC, Hat World, Inc. (mba) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (mba) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. (mba) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gilebrt Salinas. (Potter, Mark) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gilebrt Salinas, identifying Gilbert Salinas. (Potter, Mark) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gilebrt Salinas. (Potter, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-15356102 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Gilebrt Salinas. (Attorney Mark D Potter added to party Gilebrt Salinas(pty:pla))(Potter, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.