Imagenetix, Inc. v. Robinson Pharma, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Imagenetix Inc
Defendant: Doctor's Clinical, Inc., Gero Vita Inc, Nutrivita Laboratories Inc, Robinson Pharma Inc and Vitastrong Inc
Case Number: 8:2015cv00599
Filed: April 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 191 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (es)
February 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge With One Modification by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Report and Recommendation is generally approved and accepted, along with the additio nal adverse inference language provided for in this Order; Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 69) is granted only with respect to the issuance of the adverse inference instruction; and The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. See document for further information. (lwag)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Imagenetix, Inc. v. Robinson Pharma, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor's Clinical, Inc.
Represented By: Anthony B Cartee
Represented By: Daniel D Do-Khanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gero Vita Inc
Represented By: Anthony B Cartee
Represented By: Daniel D Do-Khanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nutrivita Laboratories Inc
Represented By: Anthony B Cartee
Represented By: Daniel D Do-Khanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robinson Pharma Inc
Represented By: Anthony B Cartee
Represented By: Daniel D Do-Khanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vitastrong Inc
Represented By: Anthony B Cartee
Represented By: Daniel D Do-Khanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Imagenetix Inc
Represented By: Daniel A Kotchen
Represented By: Gregory P Olson
Represented By: Michael von Klemperer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?