Benjamin Solis v. R.T.C. Grounds
Petitioner: Benjamin Solis
Respondent: R. T.C. Grounds
Case Number: 8:2015cv00796
Filed: May 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge, It is Adjudged that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benjamin Solis v. R.T.C. Grounds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. T.C. Grounds
Represented By: David Delgado-Rucci
Represented By: Kevin R Vienna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Benjamin Solis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?