Weco Supply Company, Inc. v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
| Weco Supply Company, Inc. |
| The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| Weco Supply Company, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv00171 |
| February 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Oliver W. Wanger |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER re: 84 Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/1/2013. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER VACATING April 1, 2013 hearing date and order for expedited briefing, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 2/20/2013. (Sherwin Williams opposition or notice of non-opposition Deadline: 2/28/2013; Weco Reply due by 3/7/2013)(Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER regarding Defendant's 82 Request for Clarification, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/11/2013. (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER DENYING 74 Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees; JUDGMENT AND COSTS signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/2/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Vacating October 15, 2012 Hearing Date and Taking Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees Under Submission 74 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/4/12. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER on Supplemental Motion For Summary Judgment 47 70 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/6/2012. (IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Summary judgment on the First Amended Complaints Sixth Cause of Action for breach of the implied contra ct of good faith and fair dealing is GRANTED in favor of Sherwin-Williams; 2. Summary judgment on the First Amended Cross-Complaints First Cause of Action is GRANTED in favor of Sherwin-Williams; 3. Sherwin-Williams shall file proof of its damages, f ees, costs, and interest at the legal rate under Ohio law, along with a proposed order within twenty (20) days of service of this order. Weco shall file its objections, if any, within ten (10) days of service of Sherwin-Williams proposed order. The Court will thereafter enter a final award of damages in favor of Sherwin-Williams; 4. The pretrial conference and trial dates are hereby VACATED.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Setting Supplemental Briefing Schedule On Summary Judgment And Continuing Pre-Trial Conference And Trial Dates, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/31/2012. (Defendant's Supplemental Deadline: 6/15/2012, Plaintiff's Reply Brie f due by 7/6/2012, Plaintiff's Opposition/Non-Opposition due by 6/29/2012, Jury Trial set for 10/10/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii, Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii)(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER on motions for summary judgment. signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/25/12. (Nazaroff, H)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER CONTINUING Pretrial Conference, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/11/2012. Pretrial Conference RESET for 6/8/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER VACATING the hearing on defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, document 47 , currently noticed for hearing on 5/14/2012, and deeming the matter suitable for decision without oral argument and taking it under submission as of said date; order signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/8/2012. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER DENYING 46 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate Judge's Ruling signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/24/2012. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER VACATING Hearing Date of April 23, 2012 and Taking Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Reconsideration Under Submission, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/17/2012. (Scheduled motion hearing date of 4/23/2012 is hereby VACATED, and the parties shall not appear at that time. As of 4/23/2012, the Court will take the matter under submission and will thereafter issue its decision.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
42
STIPULATED Amendment to Scheduling Conference Order; ORDER - Discovery by 1/15/2012. Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 1/31/2012. Dispositive Motions filed by 3/28/2012. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE is continued from 12/13/2011 before Judge Snyder to May 3 , 2012 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE set for 5/25/2012 at 08:30 AM and JURY TRIAL set for 7/9/2012 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2 (AWI) before Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/18/2011. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
32
Courtroom Decorum. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATED Confidentiality Agreement and Protective ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 2/1/2011. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER to extend Defendant's time to file answer to First Amended Complaint signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/22/2010. ( Filing Deadline: 1/7/2011) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER Re Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First amended Complaint 21 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/22/2010. (Defendants motion to strike is DENIED; Plaintiffs first amended complaint is ORDERED FILED; Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to respond to the amended complaint.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
