Moriarity v. Henriques et al
Plaintiff: Linda D. Moriarity
Defendant: Janalie Henriques and Hunt & Henriques Law Firm
Case Number: 1:2011cv01208
Filed: July 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Presiding Judge: Oliver W. Wanger
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER DISMISSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/1/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER After Notice of Settlement, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/14/2013. (Hall, S)
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 35 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/19/13. (Hellings, J)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Request for a Telephonic Appearance at the Mid-Discovery Status Conference 31 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/7/2013. (Hall, S)
January 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 28 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/29/2013. (Hall, S)
September 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 (AMENDED) ORDER REASSIGNING ACTION, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/13/12. (Hellings, J)
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER To Defendants To File signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/1/2012. Filing Deadline: 2/15/2012. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
November 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Directing U.S. Marshall to Serve Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/7/11. (Verduzco, M)
October 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff Either to File a Second Amended Complaint OR Notify the Court of Her Willingness to Proceed Only on Claims Found to Be Cognizable, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/11: Amended Complaint/Notice due 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Hellings, J)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/15/2011 granting 3 Motion to Proceed IFP and requiring Plaintiff either to file an amended complaint or to notify the court of her willingness to proceed only on claims found to be cognizablere 1 Complaint. (Amended Complaint due by 9/19/2011). (Lundstrom, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moriarity v. Henriques et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda D. Moriarity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janalie Henriques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hunt & Henriques Law Firm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?