Dent v. Lopez, M.D., et al.
| Nadean Dent |
| C. R. Bard, Inc., Elva Lopez, M.D., Davol Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Does 1-100 |
| 1:2014cv00442 |
| March 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER re 23 Findings and Recommendations and 24 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/30/2014. This case is remanded to Kern County Superior Court. Copy of remand order mailed to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 8 be GRANTED; and this action be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for Kern County; and Defendants' Motion to Stay 7 be DISMISSED AS MOOT and all pending dates be VACATED; Motions are referred to Judge O'Neill; signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/22/2014. (Objections to F&R's are due within 14 days of this order)(Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and DISMISSING AS MOOT 7 Defendants' Motion to Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/7/2014. Copy of remand order mailed to Kern County Superior Court. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
