Suh, et al. v. Sybrowsky, et al.
| Seon Hee Suh, Seon Hee, Inc. and HSKY, LLC |
| Joel Sybrowsky, Ken Johnson, Ryan Sorenson, Lodging Dynamics Hospitality Group, LLC and Arthur Holman |
| 1:2014cv01720 |
| October 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Contract: Other |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3731 Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/30/2015 GRANTING 35 Defendants' 20 Motion to Stay, until the resolution of the case proceeding in Utah; within 10 days of the ruling of the appellate court in Utah on the issue of personal jurisdiction, the parties shall submit a status report to the Court; Counsel for Plaintiffs is ORDERED to submit a declaration within 10 days showing cause why she should not be sanctioned for failure to appear timely at the hearing. CASE STAYED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/21/15 ORDERING that the EX PARTE MOTION to Continue the hearing 25 is GRANTED; The Hearing on Defendants' MOTION to STAY Proceedings Until Resolution of Action 20 and MOTION to TRANSFER MOTION to CONSOLIDATE CASES 23 currently scheduled for 1/28/15 is CONTINUED to 3/11/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
