Sommers v. City of Taft, et al.
| Steven Sommers |
| City of Taft, Taft Police Department, Ed Whiting and Veronica Sandoval |
| 1:2014cv01884 |
| November 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/4/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE (Text Only): This case has been assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; the new case number is 1:14-cv-01884-JLT. (Sant Agata, S) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only), signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/4/2015: All parties have consented #9 #14 to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court REASSIGNS the action to United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston for all further proceedings. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the new case number 1:14-cv-01884-JLT. (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Steven Sommers. (Rossiter, Martha) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/27/2015: Within five days, the parties SHALL file a notice indicating whether they will stipulate to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for purposes of processing the dismissal #12 . (Hall, S)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal by Steven Sommers. (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER with Jury Demand by City of Taft, Veronica Sandoval, Taft Police Department, Ed Whiting. Attorney Peake, Larry Fred added.(Peake, Larry) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO ELECT REFERRAL OF ACTION TO VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM (VDRP) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 271 by City of Taft. (Peake, Larry) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by City of Taft. Attorney Peake, Larry Fred added. (Peake, Larry) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: City of Taft served on 12/3/2014, answer due 12/24/2014. (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Taft Police Department served on 12/3/2014, answer due 12/24/2014. (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Veronica Sandoval served on 12/3/2014, answer due 12/24/2014. (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Ed Whiting served on 12/3/2014, answer due 12/24/2014. (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Status Conference re Consent / Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/16/2015 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Order Assigning Action to Sac DJ, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Taft, Veronica Sandoval, Taft Police Department, Ed Whiting* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Martha June Rossiter* *Rodriguez and Associates* *2020 Eye Street* *Bakersfield, CA 93301*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs by Steven Sommers. Attorney Rossiter, Martha June added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-5630788) (Rossiter, Martha) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Steven Sommers (Rossiter, Martha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
