Castaneda v. City of Farmersville et al
| Mike Castaneda |
| City of Farmersville, Jeremy Brogan, Mario Krstic, Farmersville Police Department and Farmersville City Manager |
| 1:2015cv00148 |
| January 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tulare |
| John A. Mendez |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/17/17 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/10/2017 ORDERING All settlement documents shall be filed on or before 5/30/2017.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/10/2015 GRANTING defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's 19 First Amended Complaint claims against the City with LEAVE TO AMEND. If plaintiff chooses to amend, he must file his new Complaint within 20 days of date of Order. Defendants must file their responsive pleading within 20 days thereafter. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that the Third and Fourth Causes of Action be Dismissed from the Complaint with Prejudice. The hearing previously set for 3/25/2015, is hereby VACATED. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/25/2015. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
