Mozingo v. Fisher et al
Plaintiff: James Mozingo
Defendant: Raythel Fisher, Jr., Ladd and C. Lowery
Case Number: 1:2015cv00633
Filed: April 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for December 20, 2016 at 10:00AM before Judge McAuliffe). PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/2/2016. (Herman, H)
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 STIPULATION of the Parties to Extend the Deadline to Amend the Pleadings; ORDER: having considered the stipulation of the parties, the deadline to amend the pleadings is moved from October 7, 2016, to November 11, 2016. All other dates in the Scheduling Order remain as set. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/26/2016. (Herman, H)
April 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Second Amended Complaint and Vacating Hearing. Based on the lack of opposition, the Court concludes that the matter is appropriate for determination without oral argument and vacates the Moti on hearing set for April 27, 2016. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED; (2) Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file his Third Amended Complaint; (3) < i> Upon the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons as to Sgt. Huff; and (4) Sgt. Huff shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to the Third Amended Complaint in compliance with the time frames of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any relevant Local Rules following Plaintiffs service of the Third Amended Complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/20/2016. (Herman, H)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STIPULATION Of The Parties Regarding Service Of The Second Amended Complaint; ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/29/2016. (Fahrney, E)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Granting Stipulation to Permit an Amendment to the Second Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 01/19/2016. (Flores, E)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Complaint and VACATING HEARING (Docs. 20, 21): the Court VACATES the hearing set for December 4, 2015. (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint is GRA NTED; (2) Within ten (10) days of service of this Order, Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint; (3) Upon the filing of the Second Amended Complaint, the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons as to I. Singh, M.D., Barbara Woodward, PA, an d K. Phana, PA; (4) I. Singh, M.D., Barbara Woodward, PA, and K. Phana, PA, shall file their respective answers or other responsive pleadings to the Second Amended Complaint in compliance with the time frames of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure a nd any relevant Local Rules following Plaintiffs service of the Second Amended Complaint; (5) Defendants Lowery and Ladd are not required to file an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/13/2015. (Herman, H)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION to Continue Mandatory Schedule Conference; ORDER - Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 10/8/2015 to October 27, 2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/30/2015. (Herman, H)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Stipulation to Strike Portions of First Amended Complaint; ORDER REQUIRING Filing of Second Amended Complaint Reflecting Stipulated Changes, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/10/2015. (Marrujo, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mozingo v. Fisher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raythel Fisher, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ladd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Lowery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Mozingo
Represented By: Ken I Karan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?