Poston v. Nevada County
||Robert Tamietti, Jason Jones, California Department of Highway Patrol, Eric Wagner, Keith Royal, Donald E. Lown, Jr., Tamara Zuromskis and Clifford Newell
||June 2, 2010
||California Eastern District Court
||Frank C. Damrell
|Nature of Suit:
||Constitutionality of State Statutes
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 27, 2010
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/27/10 ORDERING that the actions denominated 2:10-CV-01248-FCD-KJM (PS) and 2:10-CV-1349 FCD-DAD (PS) be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further p roceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassignedcase only are hereby VACATED; the caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:10-CV-01248-JAM EFB (PS) and 2:10-CV-01349 JAM-EFB (PS); and the Clerk make appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Becknal, R)
|September 9, 2010
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/9/10 ORDERING that the hearing on deft's Motions, 12 and 14 , is continued to 10/27/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. It is further ORDERE D that pltf shall SHOW CAUSE, no later than 10/13/10, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to deft Tamietti's motion. Failure to do so will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition to the motion and may result in a recommendation of dismissal. Deft's may reply to pltf's opposition on or before 10/20/10.(Owen, K)
|October 18, 2010
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/10: ORDERING that the hearing date of October 27, 2010 on defendants' motions to dismiss 12 and 14 , is vacated. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Defendants' motions to dismiss be denied as moot and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.