The Arc of California, et al v. Douglas, et al
Plaintiff: The Arc of California and United Cerebral Palsy Association of San Diego
Defendant: Toby Douglas, California Department of Health Care Services, Terri Delgadillo and California Department of Developmental Services
Case Number: 2:2011cv02545
Filed: September 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1396
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 246 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/3/19 ORDERING this case DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
March 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 233 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 03/28/18 GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART the 229 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' fourth cause of action, which the Court DISMISSES without prejudice, and DENIED as to Plaintiffs' remaining causes of action. (Benson, A.)
June 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER LIFTING STAY signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/16/2017. The stay in this case is LIFTED and Defendants may refile their motion for summary judgment. Any such motion for summary judgment shall be filed within 20 days of electronic filing of this order.(Washington, S)
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 208 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 08/26/16 ORDERING that the State's 194 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED; plaintiff's First Claim, for violation of the Medicaid Act, is now DISMISSED for failure to state a viable claim, and the Court's 185 02/13/15 injunction as to plaintiffs' Medicaid Act claims is DISSOLVED in its entirety; the State's 199 Request/Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; The State may file a Motion for Summary Judgment within 30 days; plaintiff's 195 Motion for Attorney Fees is DENIED. The Court will issue an order setting forth any remaining dates in this matter, including dates for trial and a final pretrial conference, once any additional dispositive motion has been ruled upon. (Benson, A)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/31/2015 ORDERING 186 Defendants' Motion to Vacate is DENIED with the exception that the language quoted in the preceding paragraph from the Court's 2/13/2015 Memorandum and Order is hereby stricken. (Reader, L)
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/11/15 DENYING 172 Motion for Summary Judgment and 180 Motion to Strike. (Manzer, C)
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 168 ORDER granting Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Modify Scheduling Order and For Order Shortening Time in Which to Bring a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 163). Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is set for hearing Friday, November 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7. (Deutsch, S)
October 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/2/14 ORDERING Plaintiff has failed to make a particularized showing as to the need for interrogatories in addition to the interrogatories previously propounded. Plaintiffs motion for leav e to exceed the presumptive limit on the number of interrogatories 149 , except as set forth below, is therefore denied; Plaintiff has withdrawn the motion to compel further response to interrogatory no. 8; Plaintiffs motion to compel 149 i s granted in part. Within fourteen days, defendants shall provide further responses to: request for admission nos. 8 and 9; interrogatory no. 1 as to any denial of requests for admissions nos. 8 and 9; interrogatory nos. 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 to the extent these interrogatories call for information pertaining to the uniform holiday schedule and half-day billing rule; and interrogatory no. 10; Defendant shall supplement the responses to requests for production of documents to clarify whether any responsive documents exist that pertain to the uniform holiday schedule and half-day billing rule; The remainder of the motion to compel is denied; The court finds in the circumstances presented on the motion that an award of expenses is not warranted. (Becknal, R)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 147 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/31/14. (Kastilahn, A)
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/19/14 ORDERING that plaintiff's 136 motion to compel is DENIED. The denial is without prejudice to renewal of the motion if the Medicaid claim is reinstated and plaintiffs are granted permission to exceed the presumptive limit on the number of interrogatories. Defendants's 134 motion to compel is granted in part. Within 28 days, plaintiffs shall provide further responses to the interrogatories. The court finds an award of expenses is not warranted. (Kastilahn, A)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 129 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/16/13 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION for Protective Order 107 is DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/1/2013 ORDERING that Defendant's 53 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' First Claim for Relief, for in junctive relief under the Medicaid Act, but DENIED as to all remaining Counts. Because the Court concludes that the deficiencies of Plaintiffs' First Claim for Relief cannot be rectified by amendment under the circumstances present herein, no leave to amend that Claim will be permitted. (Zignago, K.)
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/27/13 DENYING 59 Motion for Sanctions. (Meuleman, A)
January 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 99 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/15/2013 ORDERING that Exhibits A-C attached to the declaration of Brian Winfield, filed in this action at ECF No. 90 -6 pages 1-21 be sealed. The Clerk of Court is directed to seal the entire ECF No. 90 -6 and Counsel Rebecca Armstrong is directed to file the unsealed portions of 90 -6 as a new document entry. (Zignago, K.)
November 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/20/12: Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for an Order to Show Cause re: Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. Plaintiffs' alternative request for a preliminary inj unction shall, however, be heard by regularly noticed motion. That motion is set to be heard on January 10, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 7. HEARING as to 59 Motion for Sanctions and 53 Motion to Dismiss RESET for 1/10/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/3/12 ORDERING the Court declines to stay the scheduled depositions, and Defendant's Emergency Ex Parte Application 55 is also DENIED.(Matson, R)
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/13/2011 GRANTING 12 Ex Parte Application for Stay of Proceedings; DENYING 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 23 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to being reinstituted when the instant stay is limited. Joint Status Report due within 60 days or upon the disposition of the matters set forth, whichever occurs first. CASE STAYED. (Michel, G)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Arc of California, et al v. Douglas, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Arc of California
Represented By: Chad Wesley Carlock
Represented By: William Thomas McLaughlin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Cerebral Palsy Association of San Diego
Represented By: Chad Wesley Carlock
Represented By: William Thomas McLaughlin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toby Douglas
Represented By: Rebecca M. Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Health Care Services
Represented By: Rebecca M. Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terri Delgadillo
Represented By: Rebecca M. Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Developmental Services
Represented By: Rebecca M. Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?