Thompson v. Sacramento Municipal Court
||Sacramento Municipal Court
||Christopher D. Thompson
||April 17, 2013
||California Eastern District Court
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 23, 2013
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/22/13 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)
|June 12, 2013
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/12/13 ORDERING that 5 letter is construed as a request for extension of time to comply with the courts April 23, 2013 order, and, so construed is GRANTED; Within 30 days of the filing date of this order, petitioner shall submit an affidavit insupport of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee; and Petitioners request for clarification 6 is GRANTED. (Dillon, M)
|July 1, 2013
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/28/13 ORDERING that 8 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of these findings and recommendations together with a copy of the petition filed in the instant case on the Attorney General of the State of California; and Petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.