Ellis v. Keener et al
| Robert Ellis |
| Morris and Keener |
| 2:2013cv01299 |
| June 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/6/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 9 , filed on August 21, 2013, are hereby VACATED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to file plaintiffs requests at ECF No. 11 and ECF No. 12 in the docket of Case No. 2:11-cv-2954 TLN DAD P; and the Clerk shall close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/20/13 ORDERING the clerk of the court make a random assignment of a district judge to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; and the Clerk shall send petitioner a new ifp application.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
