Strobl v. Farrow et al
Nicholas Strobl |
Joseph A Farrow and California Highway Patrol |
2:2013cv01436 |
July 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 STIPULATION and ORDER 28 for Voluntary Dismissal signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/24/2015. This action is DISMISSED, in its entirety, with prejudice, and in favor of the defendants. Each side shall bear its own costs of litigation including attorney's fees. Clerk directed to CLOSE this case. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/26/15 ORDERING that the parties are directed to meet and confer within 15 days after the date this Order is electronically filed. The parties are further directed to file a joint statement w ith the Court not later than 15 days after they meet and confer. Defendants' pending Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 16 and 18 , are DENIED without prejudice to being renewed in whole or in part after the implications of Plaintiff's criminal convictions have been addressed. Any obligation on Defendants' part to answer the currently operative First Amended Complaint is stayed pending further notice from the Court. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 1/27/2015 (Kastilahn, A). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.