Ray v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC
| Quianna Ray |
| Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC |
| 2:2013cv01472 |
| July 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/29/14 ORDERING, good cause appearing, the parties' stipulation for a stay pending final approval of the proposed class action settlement in Shelley Carl, et al. v. Advanced Call Cent er Technologies, LLC, Superior Court for the State of California, Sacramento County, Case No. 34-2013-00148310, is GRANTED. The Parties are directed to file a joint statement notifying the Court of the status of the proposed class action settlement within three days of the Sacramento Superior Court's ruling on the motion for final approval. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
21
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/2013 ORDERING 20 that the foregoing Protective Order is APPROVED and the parties are ORDERED to act in compliance therewith. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER of 10 NON-RELATED CASES signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/31/2013. Court is DECLINING to relate cases pursuant to Local Rule 123. Assignment of matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial eff ort or other economies. These actions involve the same or similar defendants, but the actions involve different proposed classes, there are unique facts and claims to each case, it is not clear that the same result should follow in these actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of labor. Therefore, this action shall NOT be reassigned to Judge Nunley. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ray v. Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advanced Call Center Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael Gerald Leggieri |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Quianna Ray | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Franklin Gaines |
| Represented By: | Alex Paul Katofsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
