Darwin v. Social Security Administration
| John Darwin, IV |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2014cv00740 |
| March 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/3/2015 ORDERING 27 the the Commissioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment is DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/2/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 17 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.The Commissioner's 21 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for the immediate calculation and award of benefit. The Clerk shall enter judgment for plaintiff, and close this case. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/15: Defendant shall file a Reply addressing plaintiff's newly raised issue regarding Dr. Chen particularly the assertion that the Commissioner may be reviewing the underlying decision here, and/or considering providing some form of relief to plaintiff1 no later than May 21, 2015, at which time the matter will be taken under submission. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/4/15 ORDERING that the time for responding to Plaintiff's 17 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is EXTENDED from 2/9/15 to 3/11/2015. The parties further stipulate that the Court 's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant's response brief will be due on 3/11/15, and Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, shall be filed within twenty one (21) days after service of Defendant's brief. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/6/14 ORDERING that the Request for Extension of time is GRANTED; Plaintiff may file her MOTION for Summary Judgment by 1/8/2015, with Defendant's brief due 2/9/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/9/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk directed to serve Scheduling Order and serve copy of Order on U.S. Marshal. Within 14 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall submit to U.S. Marshal a completed Summons, copies 1 Complaint, and file a Statement with Court that said documents have been transmitted. [cc: U.S. Marshal Services] (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Darwin v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Darwin, IV | |
| Represented By: | Richard Allen Whitaker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
