Sacramento City Unified School District v. Harlan et al
Plaintiff: Sacramento City Unified School District
Defendant: Kenneth Harlan, Julie Harlan and R. H.
Case Number: 2:2014cv01549
Filed: June 30, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STIPULATION and ORDER TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/5/2017 ORDERING that pursuant to Rule 41(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 JUDGMENT ON IDEA CLAIMS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/22/2017 ORDERING that Defendants/Counterclaimants are the prevailing party with respect to both Plaintiff's claim under IDEA and Defendants/Counterclaimant's first cause o f action under the IDEA; on Issues 1(a) and 1(b) in the underlying administrative decision in OAH Case No. 2013100405; Defendants/Counterclaimants are entitled to reimbursement of their costs associated with R.H.'s placement at Falcon Ridge; Def endants/Counterclaimants are entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection both with the underlying administrative action and this action. The Clerk of Court shall release the deposit made to the Court by Plaintiff on 7 /2/2014, in the amount of $111,368.75. Within thirty (30) days of the release of the funds by the Court, Plaintiff shall Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. in the amount of $45,400; Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant J.H. in the amou nt of $45,946; Pay Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. interest in the amount of $3,105.04; Pay Defendants/Counterclaimants' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs associated with the underlying administrative proceeding before OAH and this action, in the amount of $152,500, to Ruderman & Knox, LLP. (cc: Financial) (Zignago, K.)
January 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/24/17 ORDERING that the deadline for the parties to submit to the Court a joint proposed judgment or a joint statement explaining their positions as to a proposed judgment, is EXTENDED to 02/15/17. (Benson, A)
January 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/2017 ORDERING the parties to meet and confer to discuss and attempt to resolve their differing views on calculating any potential interest owed; ORDERING the parties to file a joint proposed judgment within fourteen (14) days; ALTERNATIVELY ORDERING the parties to file a joint statement explaining their positions if they are unable to reach an agreement. (Michel, G.)
October 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 OPINION signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/6/16; DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and finds that the ALJs Decision is substantially supported by the administrative record and thus AFFIRMS the ALJ's Decision; DENYING 19 Counter Motion for Summary Judgment as to second and third counterclaims. (Washington, S)
February 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER to SEAL administrative record signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/3/15. (Manzer, C)
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/15/14: The Petition for an Order Appointing K.H. and J.H. as guardians ad litem for R.H. is hereby GRANTED. (Kaminski, H)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/7/14: Documents 2 through 5, in addition to document 1, shall be placed under seal. (Kaminski, H)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AND CHANGING CASE CAPTION signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/31/14 re: 7 . (Meuleman, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sacramento City Unified School District v. Harlan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sacramento City Unified School District
Represented By: Daniel Andrew Osher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth Harlan
Represented By: Colleen A. Snyder Holcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Harlan
Represented By: Colleen A. Snyder Holcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. H.
Represented By: Colleen A. Snyder Holcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?