Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Matthew Murphy |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2014cv01634 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/03/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; defendant's 22 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file a reply brief is EXTENDED to 10/16/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/3/15 ORDERING that the new due date for Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 9/16/2015. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/30/2015 ORDERING that Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days to file her motion for summary judgment. The new due date for Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 8/17/2015. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/18/15 re: 16 ORDERING the new date for filing defendant's motion for summary judgment as 7/17/2015. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/16/14 ORDERING that plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to issue process and to serve upon plaintiff the undersigned's Scheduling Order and Order re Consent or Request for Reassignment for social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order upon the United States Marshal (USM). Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM the r equired documents. Within five (5) days after submitting the necessary documents to the USM for service or process, plaintiff shall file in this court a declaration stating the date on which the documents were submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve process with the necessary documents without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) (cc: USM) Modified on 10/17/2014 (Kastilahn, A).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Murphy | |
| Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
