Duerst v. Placer Court et al
Ryan J. Duerst |
Peter A. Meshot, James W. Walter, Kamala D. Harris, Sue Hansen, Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Commission on Judicial Performance, Office of the Attorney General of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, Dirk Amara, Angus Saint-Evens, Thomas E. Warriner, Francis Kearney, Mark S. Curry, Allen V. Pineschi, Placer Court and Superior Court of California, County of Placer |
2:2014cv01774 |
July 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Allison Claire |
Garland E. Burrell |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/9/2015 ORDERING that the court certifies that plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/19/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff has not made an adequate showing under any of the referenced grounds for amendment of judgment. Rather, he reiterates many of the contentions made in his Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations, which the Court considered in adopting the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. Therefore, Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion is DENIED. Further, Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief is stricken since it was improperly filed after judgment was entered. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 7 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/30/14 RECOMMENDING Plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief be denied; and Plaintiff's first amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/18/14. Amended Complaint due within 30 days. The 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The 3 Motion to Stay and 4 Motion for TRO are DENIED without prejudice. (Manzer, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.