Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ronald W. Davis |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2014cv01802 |
| July 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/1/2015 ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to respond to the 14 Motion for Summary Judgment by 7/1/2015; MODIFYING the Court's Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/16/15 ORDERING that the Request for Extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief is GRANTED. Defendant shall have a first Extension of time from 4/15/15 to 6/1/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/29/15: Plaintiff may have an extension of time, to and including March 16, 2015, in which to file Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to April 15, 2015 to file opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff continues to be due May 6, 2015. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/5/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Clerk of the Court is f urther directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of t he complaint, and five copies of the scheduling order, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald W. Davis | |
| Represented By: | Steven Gilbert Rosales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Henry L. Chi, GOVT |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
