Thaler v. Amador County, California et al
| Carson Rhodes Thaler |
| Melinda Alcoriza, Karolyn D. Kirk, Kaizen Martial Arts Academy, Sue Harlan, Jennifer Magee, Jason Aquino, Holly Rocket, Eugina Banes, Deborah Schmidt, Dennis Brimer, Ann Watts, Amador Tuolumne Community Action Agency, ATCAA, Amador County Counsel, Amador County Department of Health and Human Services/Department of Social Services/CPS, Amador County, California and Renee Day |
| 2:2014cv02013 |
| August 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/21/14 denying 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/29/14 ORDERING that: Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; and RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed with prejudice, and the case be closed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/9/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3 motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
