Dickman v. Tan et al
| Michael Dickman |
| Richard M Tan, D Blake, Martin Kuerstan, A. Pfile, Gary Swarthout, John Clark Kelso and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
| 2:2014cv02150 |
| September 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/30/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; AND RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/30/15 ORDERING the Director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the trust account of Michael Dickman and forward payment to the court until the balance is pa id in full. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit to the Director of the CDC; and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc CDC, Financial). (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
