Andrews v. Pride Industries et al
Plaintiff: Napoleon Andrews
Defendant: Pride Industries, Jean Zurbuchen, Christie Pyle and Mike Buchanan
Case Number: 2:2014cv02154
Filed: September 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/19/2019 ADOPTING 141 Findings and Recommendations in full. (York, M)
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 141 FINDINGS OF FACT signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/22/2017 ORDERING these findings of fact are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Within fourt een days after being served with these findings, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings of Fact." (Becknal, R)
September 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 136 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/22/17 ORDERING that that the filing and service deadline for the Post-Trial Briefs is EXTENDED to 09/25/17.(Benson, A.)
August 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/7/2017 ORDERING the parties to respond by 8/14/2017 to 124 Motion to Quash. The parties shall include in their briefs a statement regarding the ability to proceed with the Evidentiary Hearing set for 8/22/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Donati, J) (Main Document 125 replaced on 8/7/2017) (Donati, J).
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 111 AMENDED ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/11/2017 ORDERING Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED in PART and GRANTED in PART; this order resolves ECF No. 65 and SUPERSEDES the order filed at ECF No. 95 .(Reader, L)
January 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/10/2017 ORDERING defendants' 97 motion for reconsideration is GRANTED to the extent thecourt will correct a factual finding in its order on summary judgment; Defendants' motion is otherwise DENIED; Plaintiff's 100 motion for reconsideration is DENIED; the bench trial on federal enclave status will take place on 3/17/2017, with a joint statement due by 3/3/2017. (Reader, L)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2016 GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Michel, G.)
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/28/16 ORDERING that the filing and service deadline for the Joint Pre-Trial Conference Statement is CONTINUED to 7/15/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 7/29/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/24/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 71 request that this court extend the time for Plaintiff to file an opposition to defendants' motion to summary judgment currently due 4/22/2016 t o 5/6/2016 is GRANTED. Accordingly, defendants' 65 Motion for Summary Judgment previously set for 5/6/2016 is RESET for 5/20/2016. Plaintiff's request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to conduct the deposition of Defendant PRIDE Industries FRCP 30(b)(6) from 4/15/2016 to 4/29/2016 is GRANTED. (Zignago, K.)
April 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/15/2016. (Michel, G.)
April 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Protective Order signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/8/16. (Kaminski, H)
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/8/2016 ORDERING Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order (ECF No. 47 , as renewed by ECF No. 58 ), is DENIED, without prejudice to its renewal in proper form. The 3/9/2016 hearing on this matter is VACATED.(Reader, L)
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/29/16 ORDERING that defendant's 47 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED without prejudice; the 02/03/16 hearing is VACATED. (Benson, A)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/30/2015 GRANTING 22 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time; ORDERING that jurisdictional discovery be completed by 5/30/2015; ORDERING the plaintiff to submit an amended complaint by 6/15/2015. (Michel, G.)
March 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/5/15 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 6 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery is GRANTED as set forth. Jurisdictional discovery shall be completed by 5/1/15. "Compl eted" means not only that discovery itself is concluded, but that any discovery disputes are fully resolved. Plaintiff may seek leave to amend his complaint following the completion of jurisdictional discovery, with any motion seeking leave filed by 5/15/15. (Meuleman, A)
October 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/16/14 ORDERING that within twenty-one (21) days of the entry of this Order, plaintiff shall file a response to Pride's pending motion, or plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be dismissed with leave to amend. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Pride Industries et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Napoleon Andrews
Represented By: Andrea Rosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pride Industries
Represented By: Melissa Marie Whitehead
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jean Zurbuchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christie Pyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?