D.R. Horton, Inc. - Sacramento v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al
| D.R. Horton, Inc. - Sacramento |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and AIG Specialty Insurance Company |
| 2:2014cv02155 |
| September 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/1/2015 ORDERING that National Union is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice and National Union's 20 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is WITHDRAWN. It is FURTHER ORDERED that AIG's [2 1] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, Horton's 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against National Union is WITHDRAWN and Horton's 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against AIG is DENIED. Pursuant to 43 Stipulati on to participate in private mediation, the parties are DIRECTED to complete private mediation within 75 days of the date of this order. The parties shall file a joint status report setting forth the results of the mediation amd, if the case has not settled, propose a date for a status conference. The Status Conference set for 10/1/2015 is VACATED. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
