McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Petitioner:	Aaron D McCoy
Respondent:	California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Case Number:	2:2014cv02179
Filed:	September 19, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Kern
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit:	Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1651
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 7, 2015	Filing 11 ORDER ; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/7/15 ORDERING that petitioners application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 9 , 10 ) is granted. Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: The p etition for a writ of mandamus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to filing an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a new action; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
March 12, 2015	Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/11/15 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel 3 is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to send to petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 7, 2015

Filing 11 ORDER ; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/7/15 ORDERING that petitioners application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 9 , 10 ) is granted. Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: The p etition for a writ of mandamus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to filing an application for a writ of habeas corpus in a new action; and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

March 12, 2015

Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/11/15 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's motion for the appointment of counsel 3 is denied. The clerk of the court is directed to send to petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron D McCoy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?